by The Rat


Now that it’s all but certain that Mitt Romney will be the Republican nominee, the dutiful Obama Media Group and its left-wing lapdogs are wasting no time in firing up their transparent campaign against the former Massachusetts governor. This week’s offering? Mitt’s “polygamist” ancestor and the “controversial” faith of Mormonism.

Never mind B. Hussein’s philandering alcoholic father – a Muslim who “converted” to atheism, had multiple wives, was thrown out of Harvard, and harbored an “anti-colonialism” ideology which the son admires with a socialistic reverence unseen since the days of Vladimir Lenin’s mental masturbation over the teachings of Karl Marx. No problem. No “controversy” there, huh?

And the left-wing media bristles with laughable righteous indignation every time its blatant liberal bias is laid bare for all the world to see. Please.

Mike Taibbi of NBC – Obama water-carrier extraordinaire – described this week how Mitt Romney’s ancestors settled in Mexico during the late 1800’s: “Mitt has said and written almost nothing about them over the years. One of his rare quotes, that they left the U.S. to escape persecution for their religious beliefs.” (Ah, the Mormonism set-up comment.)

The Obama sock puppet continued: “In fact, Mitt’s great-grandfather, Miles Park Romney, led that first expedition to escape not persecution but prosecution for polygamy – what Mormons called ‘plural marriage.'” (As opposed to “drunken womanizing.”)

Wow, Mike – that didn’t take long, did it? Funny, I googled “Mike Taibbi comments on Barack Obama’s philandering father” and got nothin’.

Claiming that Mitt Romney has “ignored his Mexican roots” and that the Romney family’s Mormon faith remains “controversial” in Mexico, Taibbi said Mitt should “just tell the whole story, even about the family’s polygamist past that died with the great-grandfather Miles.” These hypocritical bastards have no shame.

Taibbi observed: “Those strong and persistent anti-Mormon sentiments led to Mitt Romney’s “Faith in America” address during his first presidential run four years ago. But for the most part, he hasn’t publically discussed his religion in detail.” Incredible.

Where can I read your call for B. Hussein to “tell the whole story,” Mike? When have you called for the Boy King to discuss the well-documented womanizing of his father? Where can I read your pleas for Obama to come clean about his drunken dad’s controversial anti-colonialism ideology, and how the son was impacted by that ideology? (See: “Faith from my Father,” by B. Hussein.)

Make no mistake, folks; the Obama Media Group will be reach new “heights” (despicable lows) in its attacks against Mitt – and its defense of the Boy King. When the liberal media knows that its Dear Leader is wounded, it will stop at nothing in its efforts to prop him up – and destroy all who would stand in their way. Tass would be proud indeed.

Journalists? Sycophants, minions, water-carriers, lapdogs, sock puppets, for sure – but JOURNALISTS? Maybe they’ll win a (collective) Nobel Prize, too.


I hear Uncle Onyango is acting up again.

About these ads

Categories: Delusion or Dishonesty?, Hypocrisy at its Finest, Liberal Hypocrisy, Obama Media Group, Planet Obama

Tags: , , , , , , ,

4 replies

  1. You keep referring to these people as journalists. That is incorrect. Journalism and journalists died long ago. Joe Q. Public is now left to sift through stories to decipher the truth on their own, grabbing tidbits from various sources to obtain a clear picture. Not journalists…news whores and servants of the progressive movement, where politicians are their pimps. I often wonder if they actually believe themselves to be unbiased, or if the realize their bias and operate on their motivation at will.

    Not only does the media today ignore the friends, family and connections of the thugs in this administration today (particularly the President), but they mask over the CURRENT activities, actions and connections of this inadequate President. I have to suspect it is nothing more than self gratification where these people seize the opportunity to stay within the circle of elite.

    Not that Romney is my first pick, but I really don’t care if he had a set of twin ax murders in his lineage, nor do I care if his ancestors believed in polygamy…I’m focussing on the man that’s here and now. In the case of the current President, the hear & now, as well as the past and periphery, are extremely scary, radical and pathetic.


  2. Questions:
    1. Since the great-grandparents fled the USA did they give up their citizenship and become Mexicans.
    2. Is there proof Mitt Romney’s grandparents both born in the USA and USA citizens? Did their leaving the country to live in Mexico threaten their USA citizenship?
    3. George Romney was born in Mexico. Did George have to become a US Citizen? When did that happen?
    4. How was George Romney able to run for president of the USA if he was NOT born in the USA? Even McCain who was born on a military base outside the USA had to get permission to run.
    5. Was Mitt born in the USA? Was Mitt an ANCHOR BABY?
    6. With Mitt’s family running back and forth over the Mexico/USA border why does Mitt not support the Dream Act? Supposedly Mitt has over 40 cousins that still live in Mexico.
    If the GOP can ask about Obama’s birther status? Why does Mitt not have to prove his citizenship – since his father for sure and possibly his mother were born in Mexico?

  3. Are we going to go through this ridiculous crap again? Seriously? This is what America cares about after everything Obama has done – and tried to do – to this country?

    “With Mitt’s family running back and forth over the Mexico/USA border why does Mitt not support the Dream Act?”

    This question is not relevant to Romney’s family “running back and forth over the border.” The “Dream Act” is attempt by Democrats to create a loophole by which they can “legalize” illegal aliens for political gain. Wise up.

    “If the GOP can ask about Obama’s birther status? Why does Mitt not have to prove his citizenship?”

    This is inconsistent logic as well. Let’s assume – for a moment – that your broad-brushed statement is correct: “The GOP” asked about the Boy King’s birth status. How does merely questioning Obama – when he steadfastly refused to release his birth certificate for more than two years – equate to forcing Mitt to prove his citizenship? Contrary to liberal spin, Barry did NOT prove his citizenship when he ran for president.

    OBAMA created the “birther” issue – NOT Republicans – nor anyone else who questioned his stubbornness (or whatever else was going on) as it related to his birth.

    I, for one, didn’t give a DAMN about Captain Teleprompter’s birth certificate; there were (and are) far more critical issues facing America as a result of his presidency than where he was born. I’m much more interested in his retirement.

What's Your Take?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 2,571 other followers

%d bloggers like this: