Hey O, Run That Part By Again About The War On Terror Being Over

APPARENTLY AL QAEDA DIDN’T GET THE MEMO

When the Regime announced last week that “The war on terror is over,” I wondered to myself, “Could this be the O-man’s ‘Mission Accomplished’ moment?” I also wondered what could possibly be the upside of making such a statement? Given that every terrorist attack against the United States post-9/11 has been thwarted, where was the possible political gain?

The only two “logical” answers are these: Obama’s election-year desire to give the appearance of having ended terrorism as we know it – and his continued obsession with doing anything and everything to convince Muslims around the world that he’s their pal. I’m willing to consider other alternatives, Obamanites.

The downside, of course, is that any plot – foiled or carried out – is a direct contradiction to O’s “Mission Accomplished” equivalency. While Barack Obama may believe the war on terror is over, unfortunately, al Qaeda didn’t get the memo.

The CIA’s thwarting of an ambitious plot by al-Qaeda of Yemen to destroy a U.S.-bound airliner using a bomb with a sophisticated new design – coinciding with the first anniversary of the killing of Osama bin Laden – makes the point. While the O-man runs around the world gloating over his role in the death of bin Laden and the Regime announces a “post-al Qaeda world” and the end of the war on terror, al Qaeda sees it differently.

Just last week, an article in al Qaeda’s Inspire magazine called for a massive firebomb campaign in the U.S. – complete with  instructions for constructing remote-controlled explosives designed to set off ember bombs in U.S. forests:

“In America, there are more houses built in the [countryside] than in the cities. It is difficult to choose a better place [than] in the valleys of Montana.” 

Apparently the terrorists’ magazine of choice failed to get the memo too, O.

The new underwear plot involved an upgrade to the bomb that failed to detonate aboard a jetliner over Detroit on Christmas Day, 2009. This new bomb was also designed to be used in a passenger’s underwear, but this time al-Qaeda developed a more refined detonation system, according to U.S. officials.

The plan was uncovered even as the Regime assured Americans that it knew of no al-Qaeda plots against the U.S. coinciding with the anniversary of bin Laden’s death. Obama-shill AP learned of the plot last week but agreed to Regime requests not to publish it immediately – because “the sensitive intelligence operation was still under way.” Translation: Disclosure of the plot would have embarrassed the O-man, who was running around the world at the time gloating over his role in the death of bin Laden. It would have also made the “war on terror is over” statement look even more foolish than it does this week.

Funny – the loons on the left have mercilessly attacked George Bush for the “Mission Accomplished” banner for nine years; in fact they’ve used it to defend the O-man’s bin Laden gloatathon. The reality, of course, is that the Navy placed that banner aboard the USS Abraham Lincoln – as a surprise display of gratitude to President Bush for his commitment to destroy al Qaeda and bring those to justice who had perpetrated the worst attack on America in history.

Pathetically, Barack Hussein Obama last week tried to claim that goal as his own. 

^

If the war on terror is over, who are we killing with drone strikes, O? Facts are stubborn things; they so often get in the way of politics, huh?

About these ads


Categories: Delusion or Dishonesty?, Huh?, Islamic Extremism, Obama the Laughable, Planet Obama, Politics and Prostitution, Seriously

Tags: , , , , ,

4 replies

  1. Reblogged this on theconservativehillbilly and commented:

    I never have cared for the term “war on terror.” It is a Muslim Crusade against non-Muslims.

  2. We will never completely leave whether new presidents come or not. Need that military base to have immediate strike power in region. US has 800 + outside of country military bases.

  3. I think I’d feel a whole lot safer if the Indiana GOP would have elected Richard Lugar in today’s primary. I’m a “Lefty Loon” who has voted for this true statesman many times over the years. I think he had one more good term in him. He was a key player in keeping nukes, biological and chemical weapons from reaching US soil for many, many years and his knowledge of foreign policy issues is invaluable. Just as recently as 2007, he worked on the Nunn-Lugar Cooperative Threat Reduction Act after the Soviet Union tanked. Unlike the extremists that exist on both sides of the aisle, this man was capable of holding more than one thought in his head at a time. Everything wasn’t good or evil, black or white with him. Very sad day for Indiana politics.

Trackbacks

  1. The Meir Amit Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center | OSINT ZONE

What's Your Take?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 2,522 other followers

%d bloggers like this: