Obama Regime Finally Kinda Sorta Stops Lying About Benghazi Terrorist Attack – On The Eve Of Congressional Hearings

EYES WILL ALSO BE ON O’S MEDIA LAPDOGS

Let me begin by stating the obvious: This would be a scandal of major – if not unprecedented – proportions were it to have occurred during the Bush Administration. Or any other Republican administration for that matter. This, of course, begs the obvious question: Will it become one now – or will the corrupt media continue its desperate attempt to shield the Regime as best it can?

That this question even needs to be asked is as stark an example of how far the media in America has fallen since the days of Walter Cronkite and Huntley and Brinkley. Hell – the left-leaning Peter Jennings would have even made sure that ABC News covered this story accurately, knowing full well that its journalistic integrity would have been at stake if it did not. Sadly, the liberal media lost its journalistic integrity years ago – so there is little hope that it will change its transparent stripes now.

Think about it. Mitt Romney was hammered by O’s sock puppets in the media virtually nonstop for days – if not weeks. But – those same sock puppets failed to even question the Regime’s obviously fabricated explanation, which began to unravel almost immediately.

Now, on the eve of a major Congressional hearing on the consulate terrorist attack, the Regime has made a desperately transparent attempt to get out ahead of the damaging news it knew would come out at the hearing. Last night, Team O finally spilled its guts:

In other words, absolutely everything we were told by the Regime – by Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice, Regime Propaganda Minister Jay Carney, and countless other Regime minions – was 100% false. Translation: They lied.

It gets worse – or should I say more bizarre? In an astonishing attempt to ask us to suspend disbelief, the Regime also claimed it had never concluded that, a: the attack on the consulate was “spontaneous”, and, b: that it was prompted by an anti-Islam movie. Are these people incompetent, arrogant or both? Doesn’t matter, folks: Barack Obama will once again rely on the same two groups that always bail him out: Democrats who either don’t give a damn – as long as O is reelected – or are too stupid to pay attention to the corruption, and the ever-dutiful, liberal lapdog media.

Here’s O’s poodle, Jay Carney, after the attack:

“Based on the information that we have now, it was – there was a reaction to the video – there was protests in Cairo, then followed by protests elsewhere, including Benghazi, and that was what led to the original unrest.”

Five days after the attack – and four days after detailed intelligence information pointed to an al-Qaeda affiliate – the Regime trotted out U.N. Ambassador Rice to appear on the Sunday morning talk shows and continue the disinformation campaign:

“This Week, our current best assessment, based on the information that we have at present, is that, in fact, what this began as, it was a spontaneous – not a premeditated – response to what had transpired in Cairo.”

Hillary Clinton had the disgraceful audacity – as is common for a Clinton – to continue the sham during the solemn ceremony at Andrews Air Force Base – with the flag-draped coffins of the four slain Americans as a backdrop:

“This has been a difficult week for the State Department and for our country. We’ve seen the heavy assault on our post in Benghazi that took the lives of those brave men. We’ve seen rage and violence directed at American embassies over an awful internet video that we had nothing to do with.”

Two full weeks after the attack, Barack Obama stood before the United Nations General Assembly and continued the charade:

“This video is an insult not only to Muslims, but to America as well. However, there are no words that excuse the killing of innocents and no video that justifies an attack on an embassy.”  

These statements were patently false – if not outright lies. As Eli Lake reported in the Daily Beast, intelligence agencies were confiding within 24 hours of the attack that it appeared to be pre-planned. Intercepts showed that an al-Qaeda affiliate boasted of its success to another al-Qaeda group on Sept. 12. “There was very good information on this within the first 24 hours,” an intelligence official told Lake.

Furthermore, Hillary’s own State Department now says it did not believe the story that the Regime was telling. The Department says it never believed the Sept. 11 attack on the consulate was the result of a film protest gone awry. In an astonishing break with the Regime yesterday, a senior State Department official said in a statement that  “others” in the executive branch concluded initially that the protest was based on the anti-Islam film:

“That was never our conclusion.” 

Something stinks in the White House, folks. As I said at the top, were this scandal to have occurred during the Bush Administration, all hell would have broken loose. It would have dominated network and cable news. Talk of impeachment would be rampant. Talk of the resignation of the Secretary of State would abound as well.

While the liberal media will be required to at least provide lip service and minimal coverage of the Congressional hearings, I doubt that it will ask the hard questions – because there are no easy answers – or plausible explanations – for the Regime:

For days after the attack, the Regime said it would not speculate on whether it was a terrorist attack – insisting it would “wait until the investigation is complete.” How then, was it able to conclude immediately that the attack was not only “spontaneous” in nature – but the result of an anti-Islam film?

If the State Department never believed its boss’s determination that a “disgusting and reprehensible video” (Hillary’s words) was responsible for the attack – and that it also never believed the attack was “spontaneous” – why did its Secretary carry on with the charade?

What “information” did the Regime “have at present” that led Susan Rice to say on Sunday morning talk shows that the “current best assessment” was that the attack on the consulate was “a reaction to a video”?

And finally, the classic Watergate question: What did the president know, and when did he know it?

With the election less than four weeks away, things are about to get down and dirty. The question is – will the Regime and its surrogates in the media be able to hide the truth long enough to give O a fighting chance come November 6?

About these ads


Categories: Benghazi Attack, Liar-in-Chief, Liberal Media Bias, Libya Consulate Attack, Lying Liberals And The Lies They Tell, Mitt Romney, Obama Media Group, Obama Reelection Campaign, Obama Regime, Obama's Foreign Policy, Obama's Incompetence, Our Embarrassment for a President, Planet Obama, Romney Campaign

Tags: , , , , , , ,

26 replies

  1. You are all over it, Rat. I’ve been saying the same thing for days now. I “shared” multiple posts on Facebook, in attempt to get the truth out there. Unfortunately, we are up against an impregnable wall in the Main Stream Media. Only the Fox News Channel is reporting this travesty with any consistency. One of the posts that I shared on Facebook had Nancy Pelosi blaming the Republicans for the deaths of our people in Libya. She claimed that Republicans reduced the funding for embassy security. What a lying scumbag! I think that Romney should use this scandal to prove to undecided voters that the administration will do anything, lie, cover-up, let our people die in effort to get elected. Ambassador Stevens asked for more security. He was denied so that the administration could avoid potentially bad press on failed policies. Liberals assume that the general population is too stupid to question their lies. Pelosi’s statement is evidence of their arrogance. Hopefully, Americans are not so dumb to fall for it. The MSM should be held accountable in protecting Barry’s failures.

    • Did you see that Fox News was excluded from the State Department briefing yesterday? The fear – and desperation – of the Regime.

      I saw the San Fran Hag’s pathetic statement, as well. Perhaps she and Harry Reid will share a room in hell.

      No doubt that it’s going to get ugly now; O is backed into a corner. He said this morning that he lost the debate because he was “too polite.” As I result, I hope his thin-skinned ass shows up all pompous and arrogant for the next debate. Should be fun to watch.

      As for the Obama Media Group, it will interesting to watch them scramble to protect O during the congressional hearings.

    • I think the operative word here is “stupid”. Anyone over 50, who’s been paying attention, can tell you that schooling, particularly in the realm of history and civics, has systematically been degraded to the extent that a significant part of the population is no longer capable of critical analysis of government and politics. My father and grandfather knew the Constitution well. They could see the corruption. I’m 61 and am only now beginning to appreciate their passion in participating in government. The problem is we’ve managed to breed a society of convenience and ambivalence (I was among them). If there’s any hope of returning to a government of “We the People”, it’s going to require a major proactive effort on the part of parents to put pressure on teachers to teach the truth and perhaps a little home schooling to teach their kids to take their teachers to task on controversial subject matter. It will take generations to unravel what’s been done over the past century or so due to the slow, methodical, and incremental process the socialists have patiently undertaken. Since schools are under the control of government, that ain’t likely to happen soon, so it seems the only hope of shifting the tide is by fostering more private schools and instituting a voucher system thereby giving public schools some healthy competition.

      I still find it hard to believe that the majority of people in this country have no knowledge of the fact that the Federal Reserve is neither Federal, nor is it a reserve… Rather, a private banking cartel created secretly by Senator Aldrich and a handful of greedy bankers. During my education in the fifties and sixties, I could swear that this important fact was completely overlooked in both my books and by my teachers. Apparently, even textbook authors were unaware of this.

      Nice article, Rat. I appreciate it.

      • Excellent comment, logarithmic, as usual.

        While I agree with everything you said, the most troubling part to me is not that a majority of people don’t know – much less understand – much of anything about the U.S. Constitution; it’s that they don’t care. Anything that gets in the way of perceived “rights” – or demands – is inconsequential. That many on the left critique our founding document as too “outdated” and “simple” to speak to today’s “more complex” issues is frightening indeed.

        Glad you enjoyed the article.

  2. This NEVER would have happened under the Bush administration, Rat. President Bush would have authorized the extra security! How I miss that man! They probably wouldn’t have even thought about it, because President Bush was a much stronger leader that this little mouse in the White House! And, if by chance, it did happen, Ms Rice wouldn’t have been so stupid as to trot out and make a totally false statement. I honestly don’t think the President Bush deliberately lied to the American people like “Bat Ears” does!

    • Couldn’t agree with you more, Lazy L. However, let’s also remember that SOMEBODY sent Rice out to the Sunday talk shows with those talking points, which incidentally, she repeated – verbatim – five times that day. This is not to absolve Rice, but to say that there will hopefully be bigger fish to fry before this is over.

  3. Unless O releases his medical records to show he was undergoing a colonoscopy at the time, what did he know and when question is answered. Also releasing college records might explain dumb debate performance. Still they are all surely doctored, and “don’t call me Shirley.” Actually Ambassador Stevens got the colonoscopy, Al-Qaeda style with no anesthetics. Hillary should let Bill answer. Bill…”Al-Qaeda didn’t have sex with that Ambassador!”

  4. As corrupt and decadent as oblama is, I am sure he helped “Mastermind” the attack, which should NOT surprise anyone.

    • I’ll stop at “cover-up.”

    • Complicit only as in liberal bubble non-reality. Man is no more than Jarrett’s and Soros’s puppet. All he ever been. No master of anything. P.S. Anonymous here not the unit. Will take own hollow point own terms only. :)

      • Figured out why I was Anonymous yesterday. Logged onto nother site requriing wordpress user name and different password. So when went back to Rat’s site needed to relog information. Didn’t reaiize. So became unwittingly that Anonymous. Dang, life too complicated. Don’t smart computers know what I mean? :)

  5. Read couple of stories on the Benghazi hearing. Looks like that’s over. Clinton not supeonaed. Issa saying unike Attorney General, Clinton forthright and up front providing the congress information. So that’s that congress done its job, huh?

    • Not over. Issa’s just playing it coy early-on because of the way he went hard after Eric”My People” Holder without O’s head lawyer ultimately being found guilty of wrong-doing. Yet.

  6. Mr. Clinton out campaigning for democrats in west and midwest. California, then Arizona on Wednesday, Iowa on Friday. Surely he will have to give support to Hillary as Sec. of State. What might he say based on past record? “Al-Qaeda didn’t have sex with our ambassador!” Or maybe he will let bus have it’s way in all this. After all USA Today says he enjoys 69 percent favorability in their poll. Bill scores 69. Post presidency has its ups and downs.

  7. Sho nuf. Daily Caller says Hillary (and Bill) been throwed under bus. Will Bill zip up, maybe down, and come out swinging? Probably won’t be to defend Hill, but for his own sorry you know what. After all… from what I read months ago he advised Hill to challenge O this year. Would have taken her out of Sec. State job before all this. Slick Willie may still be Willie the Slick. Notice all week…campaigning for demos…Calif, AZ, and Iowa, not Slimy O necessarily. His insiders knew what was coming…well, just conjecture?

  8. Speaking of lies, I just got an email with this quote which I verified on Snopes: In March of 2006, Senator Obama said this: “The fact that we are here today to debate raising America ‘s debt limit is a sign of leadership failure. It is a sign that the US Government cannot pay its own bills. It is a sign that we now depend on ongoing financial assistance from foreign countries to finance our Government’s reckless fiscal policies. Increasing America ‘s debt weakens us domestically and internationally. Leadership means that, “the buck stops here.’ Instead, Washington is shifting the burden of bad choices today onto the backs of our children and grandchildren. America has a debt problem and a failure of leadership. Americans deserve better.”

    5 years later in April of 2011 on a Good Morning America interview, President Obama said this of his reasons for the change of heart: “I think that it’s important to understand the vantage point of a senator versus the vantage point of a president. When you’re a senator, traditionally what’s happened is, this is always a lousy vote. Nobody likes to be tagged as having increased the debt limit — for the United States by a trillion dollars. As president, you start realizing, you know what, we, we can’t play around with this stuff. This is the full faith and credit of the United States. And so that was just an example of a new senator making what is a political vote as opposed to doing what was important for the country. And I’m the first one to acknowledge it.”

  9. Interesting read ‘Libyagate Coverup Unravaling’. Will try linking. If doesn’t work, it’s not too hard to find.

    http://www.bloggernews.net/128593

What's Your Take?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 2,516 other followers

%d bloggers like this: